Posterous
Not Nurse Ratched is using Posterous to post everything online. Shouldn't you?
Avatar_thumb
 

NNR’s Posterous

Photos, links, inappropriate quotes, and random twaddle

I'm slow on the uptake? Just discovered IM tricks for multiplatform chat

I like IM (particularly the clients that allow all platforms: Adium on my Mac and Beejive on my iPhone), but several things have kept me from using it to its real potential. One was that AIM wouldn't let me log in on more than one platform, so I constantly got messages from their system making me sign on with a 1. My tolerance is low enough that this caused me to quit starting the apps. The second was that my Facebook buddies would take up an entire screen. I don't WANT to chat with everyone I've friended! There are fixes. 

For the AIM thing, you can open the AIM client and check a setting, aptly named "Allow multiple connections." I tried it through both iChat and the acutal AIM app, and both worked. Then you still get a warning message, but it doesn't sign you out. I tried adding the bot as a buddy and blocking it, but its zombie rose from the dead and kept warning me. If you stay signed in, it isn't an issue. 

For the Facebook thing, I created a new Friends list called "Chat." Then, in Facebook, I went to the Friend List in the Chat menu and unchecked every list except Chat. 


I still had an "Other Friends" list (zombies?), so I just moved that slider off as well. 


Now only the Facebook friends I might actually want to IM pop up both on Adium and on my iPhone. Handy! 

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   facebook   social media  
Posted October 14, 2009
// 0 Comments

Facebook is slipping stuff in under the mat

First, I didn't ever see an option to download or convert Facebook videos before. Could it be that they're on the way to making them iPhone compatible? 

Second, apparently they did away with the useless networks and let you pick your current city (good move). Handily, on your right toolbar you can then see everybody IN that current city:


I don't know when this stuff showed up. I spent some time today making Facebook less of a time suck by weeding out a ton of people I barely even know. Interestingly, I'm finding that a lot of folks I consider "real friends" are people I know from online and have never even met in real life, but that's a topic for another post. 

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   social media  
Posted October 12, 2009
// 0 Comments

More on lifestreaming

Woke up to Steve Rubel's update to his lifestreaming experiment, and that---plus the fact that I have an actual free morning---has prompted me to jot down a few ideas that have been poking my brain lately. 

My starting point is still that no one (not even me) is interesting enough to NEED an actual lifestream as intended by the concept (notably, an online place where every single thing you do online can be seen so that nothing is missed). The lifestream concept for me is actually more for my own convenience. If I have one entry point, basically, I spend less time dicking around with various social media sites. I haven't yet found a way to get rid of duplication; there probably isn't any way to do that unless everyone on the Internets comes to a unanimous decision that we are ALL GOING TO USE FACEBOOK AND NOT TWITTER or something like that. This is not going to happen. So some of my friends are tortured by viewing the same photos on Twitter and Facebook sometimes (but not always, because I doubt that anyone reads ALL their tweets, right?). 

On that topic, I now have so many contacts on both Twitter and Facebook who consistently post photos on both that I rely on this behavior and assume I'll be able to comment about the photo on Facebook, where it's easier to follow a conversation about it. 

All of this discussion revolves around how the hell to use Posterous, though, and I still haven't quite nailed it down. I'm not bothered by that, because all of this social media jazz is transient and not really meant to be definitive. (If you want something definitive, write an autobiography and have it published in an actual book. Tweets are not really meant to be handed down to future generations.) I try to use Posterous in ways that get my material out there for two reasons: either I want people to see something I did (eg, photos) or I think people might be amused or interested by something I saw (eg, links or quotes). I'm still using yFrog for screenshots and true snapshots that are SO transient there's no point in making any effort with them. I'm not putting videos directly on Posterous because the quality sucks. I'm still writing Big Articles on my Wordpress blog, but small ones I'll write on Posterous and crosspost. Some bloglets I write as Facebook notes, which don't go anywhere else. There is no method to this madness that I can see, but it feels vaguely organized to me at the moment. If folks want to follow me only on Twitter, they can dip in and out of the stream at will. If they subscribe to my Posterous, they get more of a cross-section of my interests. Wordpress? Only the medical/technology stuff. Flickr? Only the photos (no snapshots). Facebook? All that and more, plus the ability to beat me relentlessly at Scrabble. 

Posterous as a hub with other sites as the spokes does give readers the ability to titrate to comfort: if you want a little of me, ignore the Posterous and grab the RSS for the part that interests you. If you want a lot of me, go all the way to Facebook. In between? Twitter or the Posterous RSS. 

Semper gumby. 

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   social media  
Posted September 23, 2009
// 1 Comment

friendorfollow.com: handy Twitter management

Thanks to @leohayden, I happened upon this handy, if slow-moving, site. It lets you weed out your friend and follower lists in useful ways (such as people you follow who don't follow you back or by most recent tweet; if that date is in 2008, you probably don't need that follower). I did not care much about Twitter management until recently. Indeed, I scoffed at the TERM "Twitter management." I figured people could follow me if they wanted to and vice versa, and there was no percentage in keeping track. Then the crazy spammers and bots showed up, so I started scrutinizing my followers (my favorite tool for this is Birdbrain for the iPhone) and liberally using the "block" function. This scrutiny showed me that I was following back a lot of people because they had legitimate accounts and similar interests (they were iPhone geeks, photographers, or nurses, for example) and leaving it at that, whereas these folks followed me until I followed them back and then quit following me. 

If you ask me (you did, right?), this is a bizarre way to spend your time (hoodwinking people into following you just to, I assume, bulk up your follower list). Seriously, WTF. Are people that bored? Birdbrain lets me block obvious spammers from the starting block, and now friendorfollow will let me catch these people who follow/unfollow. I follow a lot of people who don't follow me back because they're freaking funny or some other good reason (I want to read what some folks have to say, but I don't necessarily need to interact with them), but life is waaaaay too short to be reading about regular (unfunny/uninformative) people's lives who have zero intention of engaging in conversation because they've stopped following me. I still try to keep my followers list to a reasonable number that I can mostly keep up with (backreading missed tweets doesn't take that long). I feel like Twitter is becoming too complicated, but one of my best skills is complicating simple matters, so I'm right on track here. 

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   social media   Twitter  
Posted September 8, 2009
// 1 Comment

Lifestreaming = overload

I've been spelunking around various lifestreaming sites. I started because I like the way Tumblr sucks in all my streams and archives them; it's interesting to scroll back and see what I was doing. There are several good sites for doing this. IMHO, the best are Friendfeed (soon to be sucked into Facebook) and Soup.io. It occurred to me, however, that WHO EFFIN' CARES? I don't like ANYONE well enough to want to meticulously look at every single thing they do online, and if anyone feels that way about me I should probably be afraid. 

Bloglets abound on how to make Google Reader bundles of all your feeds for a handy lifestream system and suchlike, but my first thoughts have been, "I already see your posts four or five times; I'm NOT subscribing to a bundle making me see them again." It's really difficult to totally avoid duplicating content in social media, and I've spent more time than it's probably worth pondering how to NOT duplicate content, but lately the trend seems to be to plaster every single snapshot in four or five different places. Posterous is a culprit, I think, much as I like it; it lets you scattershoot your stuff everywhere. I'm even selective about my "autopost everywhere" behavior and feel like I'm papering the Internet with cat photos. Well, if my cats do something adorable, which they do constantly, obviously, I usually post it from Posterous to Twitter (Twitpic equivalent) and Facebook (those people generally know my cat personally and are not on Twitter). That's three places people can see a snapshot of my cat. And I'm conservative, comparatively. I tweet links to SOME of my blog posts and SOME of my photos, and I sometimes go all out and crosspost a photo to Twitter, Facebook, and Flickr. Still, "autopost everywhere" is dangerous, I say. 

I don't mean to make the point that cat snapshots are the ruin of the world as we know it, but rather to urge a dampening to the lifestreaming fervor raging on the Internets lately. We aren't that interesting. This stuff is a river of information and lifelets (snippets of life) that can't be all processed, kept, and admired. We need to get more in the habit of throwing our flowers in the river and letting them float away. 

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   social media  
Posted August 22, 2009
// 2 Comments

Answers to the Top 10 Twitter Objections | Michael Hyatt | Chief Executive Officer | Thomas Nelson, Inc.

http://michaelhyatt.com/2009/07/answers-to-the-top-10-twitter-objections.html

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   social media   twitter  
Posted August 13, 2009
// 0 Comments

How important is it to be right online?

I spent much of the day consumed in the back-and-forth, which had no benefit that I could see. The exchange, in fact, took days to run its course, as none of us were willing to let the conversation die; we all felt we had to add our two cents and get the last word in. Hours of my workweek were spent dealing with it. If only I had resisted, I would have saved myself a great deal of time and hassle. Those two cents I added ended up costing me a great deal.

From Wisdom 2.0, by Soren Gordhamer. It describes my day yesterday dealing with a crazy person on Twitter. Had I blocked her at the start, I would not have been mad all day. (Part of my anger was that I was pissed off at someone I didn't even know!) Is it that important to be right? In this case I was trying to appear reasonable, so I guess I should ask: is it that important to seem reasonable? Now I would say no. The beauty of online contacts is the "unfollow" button. At the very least, after the first personal attack having nothing to do with the topic, I wish I'd blocked her and been done with it. In real life, I don't have a choice sometimes. Online, I do. Why waste that choice?

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   social media  
Posted August 6, 2009
// 2 Comments

Are You F*cking Kidding Me? (Facebook Song) video #fb

Great FB commentary. Just last night I was talking to my friends Lynn and Jackie about a friend request I got for which I opined that a stronger button than "Ignore" was desired.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   humor   social media  
Posted August 6, 2009
// 2 Comments

"It's not like I blogged it...."

If you said it in public? On Twitter? It's EXACTLY like you blogged it.

Early in my blogging experience I learned about criticism and flaming from Erica at Blissful Entropy (now at http://blissfulentropy.blogspot.com/index.html; I was the one doing the flaming, and she was the one teaching me how to not be such an asshole). Today I was the one flamed, on Twitter, and, because I don't like to take up people's streams with dozens of tweets, moved the conversation over here to Posterous. This person DM'ed me, demanding (and threatening) I remove my post, which I did because she eventually said please. Hey, we all have bad days. I've put my foot in my mouth more times than I can count with social media.
 
But the thing I want to comment on was a point in her, um, requests for me to remove my rebuttal and requests for further commentary: "It's not like *I* blogged it" [emphasis mine]. Ahem. You said it on Twitter? It IS like you blogged it. It's not even LIKE you blogged it. You tweeted it? You blogged it. Which is why Twitter is called a micro BLOGGING platform.
 
It seemed like an important point to reiterate. (Or iterate for the first time, because I've never previously made this particular point.)

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   social media  
Posted August 5, 2009
// 2 Comments

This is a picture of an ASS. From Brightkite. Buh-bye.

I don't know whose ass it is. I could have spent the time to find out, but I was afraid it might be someone I know, and you just can't recover from that kind of thing. I'm giving up on Brightkite, which is upsetting because it was originally a good idea. Its proponents quaver that Twitter is just filled with useless drivel ("She doesn't get it" was scathingly directed to me, and correctly so), in response to which I need only point to this ass. At first BK was filled with nice location-relevant pics and notes, and I really liked it. Now it is filled with, well, ass. And tits (I believe today was "tittytuesday" or some such). I guess if I want people to know where I am, I'll geotag my photos and/or update my Twitter location. I hope the Internets come up with a mashup for searching for local photos---like Google Maps does with Panoramio right now. But it doesn't really matter because the photos on BK right now could be taken anywhere. This ass could be an Arizona ass for all I know. I wonder if the photo was lovingly cropped and touched up (I would be doing some major Photoshopping of MY ass). But I digress. Farewell, Brightkite. I'll look at it as simplifying my life a little bit: one more bookmark to delete, one fewer site to follow.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   social media  
Posted August 5, 2009
// 0 Comments